Guest post written by: Sonia Haerizadeh, Law Fellow at the International Community of Women Living with HIV

In order to prevent vertical transmission of HIV, it is critical that the perspectives and concerns of women living with HIV are meaningfully considered. Therefore, to inform the 2013 World Health Organization Consolidated Guidelines Process, the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW) and the Global Network of People Living with HIV (GNP+) held focus group discussions in Malawi and Uganda with women living with HIV and their communities. The women and community members shared their perspectives and concerns, and made programmatic recommendations based on their lived experiences.

The goal of the focus group discussions was to understand participants’ perspectives on Option B+, a program designed to prevent vertical transmission. Option B+ recommends that pregnant women living with HIV begin triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) as soon as diagnosed with HIV and continue the therapy for life. This is different from other programs, Options A and B, which recommend that pregnant women living with HIV stop treatment after the risk of transmission to the child has passed, unless their CD4 count is below 350 cells/mm3.

Almost all participants from both countries were happy that Option B+ protects infants from acquiring HIV and that it will likely increase access to ARVs for women who need them. However, there was a notable lack of consensus regarding the extent to which Option B+ will impact the closely interwoven dynamics of disclosure, conflict, and violence. Additionally, participants noted that HIV-related stigma from health care providers continues to prevent some women from accessing antenatal care.

All focus group participants reported that women living with HIV were not meaningfully involved in their countries’ decision-making process to adopt and implement Option B+.

“No women living with HIV of childbearing age were consulted. They sit at the top and think they speak for us…We are not aware of what is taking place…. For us here, we are left out. I’m 18 years old, you are telling me drugs for life?”

- A young woman from Uganda

Participants wanted more advocacy led by women living with HIV to ensure that governments and funders understand and provide for the needs of pregnant women living with HIV, including protecting their right to informed consent and to “opt-out” of lifelong treatment.


“From my experience, the women, they are not given a choice. If you like it or not, you have to take treatment because it is for your health and the health of your child.”

- A young woman from Malawi

Focus group participants offered recommendations to improve implementation of the new protocol. Most notable was their identification of the need for clear information about counseling around treatment initiation, the risks and benefits of beginning treatment for life, and guidance around the best breastfeeding options for each individual. Additionally, male involvement and sensitization were also mentioned as approaches that should be encouraged at all stages, including through couples testing and counseling programs. Participants also noted that male involvement should never be made a requirement for women to access care. The focus group participants also identified areas that need further research so that women can make informed and empowered decisions about their health. 

The results of the focus group discussion demonstrated the importance of including affected communities in policymaking. Taking into consideration the perspectives and experiences of women living with HIV is critical in order to ensure that programs respect human rights, increase demand for services, and improve retention and adherence.

To read the full report, please visit: http://www.emtct-iatt.org/2013/04/understanding-the-perspectives-andor-experiences-of-women-living-with-hiv-regarding-option-b-in-uganda-and-malawi/.

This post is part of a blog series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS. To view the entire series, click here.

Learn about the MHTF’s recent technical meeting focused on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS, here.

If you are interested in sharing your maternal health, HIV, and AIDS research, experience, and expertise on the MHTF Blog, please contact Kate Mitchell (kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu) or Samantha Lattof (slattof@hsph.harvard.edu).

 

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , Posted in: Commentary, Policy and Advocacy, Projects and Programs

The Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF) is pleased to offer a limited number of scholarships for eligible colleagues to attend the International Conference on Family Planning in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 12-15 November 2013.

For scholarship recipients, the MHTF will directly arrange:

  • Roundtrip transportation to Addis Ababa (lowest-priced, non-stop coach-class airfare)
  • Up to 5 nights of accommodation in Addis Ababa
  • Standard conference registration fees

Please note, however, that the MHTF will not cover visas (if required) and any other expenses, including food and local transportation.

These scholarships are limited to individuals studying or working in a public or private academic institution/facility or with a local non-governmental organization.  Individuals working for large international non-governmental organizations are not eligible to apply.  Scholarship applicants must also be from a developing country and working in a low resource setting, or from a developing country and temporarily based in a developed country to further their education/training.

In order to apply for a scholarship, you must forward your abstract acceptance email from the International Conference on Family Planning to Elizabeth Claise at eclaise@hsph.harvard.edu. Abstracts must be relevant to maternal health.

If you meet these criteria and have submitted your abstract acceptance email to Elizabeth Claise, please complete the online scholarship application form.

Application Deadline: 12 July 2013 at 11:59 pm Eastern Standard Time

Scholarship winners will be notified shortly thereafter. Selected individuals will be invited to blog about the conference or their work on the MHTF Blog.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , Posted in: Announcements, Conferences and Meetings, Opportunities

Medical guidelines to prevent post-partum hemorrhage are well-established, yet it remains the primary cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in developing countries.

Why?

Doctors and health care providers were “making the same mistakes over and over again,” says Dr. Raqibat Idris of the Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research, because they weren’t properly trained.

Last year, Idris and others set to change this with the development of a new, interactive, easy-to-use online course on the evidence-based management of Postpartum Hemorrhage, which was launched last week by The Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research GFMER, Oxford Maternal and Perinatal Health Institute OMPHI and the Maternal Health Task Force.

Designed for health care practitioners and students, the course is a series of short, stylized, interactive slides that prompt students with questions, while also providing useful information.   The course has six modules, with numerous interactive slides each that outline goals, impart information and test user knowledge. Guidelines from the World Health Organization and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on PPH were used in preparing the course. Upon successful completion of a test at the end, participants will receive a certificate singed by GFMER and OMPHI.

To access the course, please go to: http://www.gfmer.ch/omphi/pph/index.htm

Practicality was key in the course’s development, says Dr. Marloes (Luce) Schoonheim, of the Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

“In developing countries, people come across PPH and have seen books, and borrow or share them, and then they no longer have access to them,”Schoonheim says. “This course is online, and hopefully people will do the test and refer back and keep reading it. It’s been developed so it’s attractive, and so people will keep it in mind so much longer.”

Maternal mortality is still unacceptably high, especially in developing countries where 99% of these deaths occur. According to WHO, in 2010 alone approximately 280 000 women died from pregnancy and childbirth related causes. Most of these deaths are preventable. In fact, 800 preventable maternal deaths are said to occur on a daily basis. Up to a quarter of maternal deaths globally is due to obstetrics haemorrhage of which postpartum haemorrhage is the largest contributor.

The course on PPH was designed following highly successful past collaborations.

In 2010 OMPHI and GFMER started working together to produce e-learning material in the field of maternal and perinatal health. Their first success was the development and implementation of an online training course entitled “The evidence-based management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia – University of Oxford” and its Spanish version, “La evidencia basada en el manejo de la preeclampsia y eclampsia – Universidad de Oxford”. The development of this course was funded by the MacArthur Foundation through the Maternal Health Task Force at EngenderHealth.

Group training sessions, based on the online course, have been held in AfghanistanEthiopiaIndiaMexico and Nigeria.

Feedback from health professionals participating in the OMPHI/GFMER course on pre-eclampsia and eclampsia showed a high demand for a similar course on post-partum haemorrhage. Professor José Villar, University of Oxford, led the advisory board responsible for the course structure and content, which was adapted from the guidelines of WHO and the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists by Dr Raqibat Idris, GFMER; Dr Marloes Schoonheim, GFMER, edited the course. It was reviewed by a team of specialists in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Drs Friday Okonofua, Dimitrios Siassakos and Edwin Chandraharan) led by Dr Aris Papageorghiou who also contributed to the course content. eXact learning solutions developed the e-learning format. The course has been sponsored by the Maternal Health Task Force at the Harvard School of Public Health and the funding has been provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

“We want the course to spread word of mouth,” says Idris. “We are hoping that when people make use of the course, and read it, and absorb what’s in it, they will make the necessary changes in their practice and we will reach our ultimate goal of reducing maternal mortality worldwide.”

The Maternal Health Task Force supports the development of tools that will improve the maternal health of women worldwide.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , Posted in: Evidence, New Ideas and Innovations, News, Policy and Advocacy, Projects and Programs

Guest post by: Jacqueline Kingfield, World Health Partners

In India, 212 out of every 100,00 women die in childbirth.  In Uttar Pradesh (UP), India’s largest state where over 200 million people live, this number is almost double – 359 out of every 100,000.  Although the government of India has incentive programs to encourage the rural poor to deliver in institutions, the majority of the population relies on a complex network of informal and formal private providers – the former serving as the first point of contact due to proximity, and the latter being utilized for more complicated services.

In fact, in India overall, approximately 2/3 of households seek health care in the private sector.  However when thinking of “private sector providers” – one must employ an elastic definition of the “private sector.”  We do not mean a high-tech private hospital, but rather a local resident from the village who provides basic care to his or her neighbors.

This sector is highly fragmented: there is not a standard, typical provider profile, but most will have received minimal training at best – perhaps they worked in a hospital in the near-by town and have now returned to provide care out of their house in their village.  Or they might sell medicines out of a small stall, informally advising their customers on basic ailments.

These providers are also unregulated – meaning the quality of care is inconsistent.  As these providers are operating in the private sector, their focus is on earning a profit, a fact that puts them very much at odds with the needs of the rural poor.  Preventative services – such as antenatal care, family planning, and postnatal care – generally offer low profit margins.  To consistently offer this care, informal providers need encouragement and financial incentives.  These same providers are also trusted members of these communities; they have important social connections and business acumen.

How can those of us working in maternal health empower these ubiquitous informal private providers to deliver quality services at the village level?  World Health Partners (WHP) and Pathfinder International are partnering, using a social franchising approach, to leverage these rural human resources in order to extend maternal health coverage in UP.

To understand franchising, think about how the popular franchise Subway operates.  Each Subway outlet, or franchisee, is individually owned and managed, but serves the same foot-long BLT in the same paper wrapping, always prepared before the customer – ensuring that whether you bite into that BLT in DC or Delhi you are guaranteed that same Subway taste.  Franchisees benefit from the globally recognized branding, supply chain, etc.  Social franchising operates, in essence, just like a commercial franchise does, but with the aim of providing a social good.  WHP (the franchisor) brings standardization and ensures that a certain level of quality is available at all members of its branded network (franchisees) in rural India.

The network, branded ‘Sky’, links disparate private providers – such as the village chemist shop owner – to various levels of high quality care. As Sky members, providers can facilitate consultations with formally trained doctors via telemedicine, and refer clients to network clinics in peri-urban areas for physical care, including emergency obstetric care.  Increased caseloads and stature in the community are among some of the highly valued benefits to the franchisee.

In return, franchisees must adhere to WHP’s quality of care standards, supported by Pathfinder’s extensive knowledge in community-based maternal health interventions, and meet monthly targets in less profitable, preventative maternal health services.  Franchisees can continue to offer profitable curative services they delivered pre-membership, but must now also deliver these critical maternal health services.

Are you interested in the role of the private sector in delivering maternal health services? Tell us about your work! Contact Kate Mitchell at kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu to discuss sharing a guest post on the MHTF Blog.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Commentary, New Ideas and Innovations, Projects and Programs

Written by: Alison Chatfield, Project Manager, Women and Health Initiative

Complications from pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of death for adolescents in much of the developing world, leading us to ask the question: What role can the media, researchers, and policymakers play to ending the abuse and neglect of young women?The director of the upcoming HBO special “Girl Rising” will join our colleagues here at the Harvard School of Public Health at 12:30 EST today to address this critical question. Watch the panel, follow our live tweeting at @MHTF and participate by sending your questions to @ForumHSPH.

Girls’ Health and Education: Igniting Change Worldwide” will focus on the discrepancy between the knowledge that suggests educating girls is important and beneficial, and the entrenched biases that perpetuate gender inequity across the globe. It will examine the sources of these discrepancies and will review efforts to raise up the world’s girls through health and education. The Forum presents this event in partnership with Vulcan Productions, a founding partner of the 10×10 global action campaign that produced the film Girl Rising. Richard Robbins, the Director of Girl Rising, will speak on the panel, as well as our colleagues from the Francois-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, Jacqueline Bhabha and Alicia Yamin, HSPH Professor on population, economics and international health David Canning, and Donna Barry, the Advocacy and Policy Director at Partners in Health.

At the MHTF, we know how important adolescent girls are. Adolescence marks a critical juncture in life, and for girls, it often means curtailing childhood and transitioning to marriage and childbearing before reaching physical and emotional maturity. About 16 million women 15-19 years old give birth each year , and 95% of these births occur in low- and middle-income countries. These adolescents have much higher risk of maternal mortality : girls between 10 and 14 are five times more likely than women ages 20 to 24 to die from childbirth and pregnancy. Unfortunately, this means that complications from pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of adolescent death in the parts of the world where child marriage is most common.

In response, there has been much global consensus on the importance of delaying marriage and early childbearing by keeping girls in school. Literature from UNFPA, the ICRW and the Population Council suggests improving girls’ access to the classroom is strongly associated with delaying marriage. The classroom can also serve as an effective intervention point to equip both girls and boys with accurate sexual and reproductive health curriculum before marriage. Calls for more comprehensive education for children in China and Kenya demonstrate the demand for higher quality sex education to increase youth’s ability to negotiate safe sex. That being said, there are many examples of countries pushing back against sex education in schools, citing inadequate consultation with parents and lack of synergy with cultural and religious values.

Even if schools were to offer meaningful educational opportunities, numerous factors prevent girls from attending school regularly that do not affect their male counterparts. Menstruation can prohibit girls from attending school if adequate hygiene and sanitation is unavailable. Hygiene and sanitation can also compel girls who are responsible for their families’ access to clean water to stay home from school. These access barriers are not simply logistical problems; they are reflective of deeply-engrained norms around gender. Girls attending school regularly is not always a priority, especially in contexts where opportunities for further education and/or employment for girls are unavailable. Therefore, hygiene and sanitation interventions that seek to improve classroom access for girls require attention to the systemic issues that perpetuate inequity.

Are you interested in discussing these issues more? Then tune into the Leadership Studio event today, Friday, June 14, 2013, from 12:30 pm – 1:30 pm. You can join the conversation by emailing questions for the expert participants any time before or during the live webcast to theforum@hsph.harvard.edu. You can also follow us @MHTF to follow along with our live-tweets of the event, and tweet your questions for panelists @ForumHSPH. Use #girlshealtheducation to add to the global discussion of the importance of girls’ health and education.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Announcements, Commentary, Conferences and Meetings, Policy and Advocacy

This post is part of a blog series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS.  To view the entire series, click here.

Tuesday marked the second day of our technical meeting Maternal health, HIV, and AIDS: Examining research through a programmatic lens, convened in collaboration with USAID and the CDC.  Presentations and discussions revolved around lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pregnant women, including resource and programmatic challenges, ethical and medical issues, relevant experiences implementing Option B+, and new policy guidelines.

In the afternoon, meeting participants broke into small working groups to discuss knowledge gaps and next steps for improving the quality of maternal health and HIV services in sub-Saharan Africa. The groups focused on five main issues: measurement, behavior change, preconception counseling, antenatal care, and intrapartum/postpartum care.

The meeting report will be available on the MHTF site soon. Please stay tuned!

Join the conversation on Twitter: #MHHIV.

Take a look at our Storify for a recap of discussions from day two.

See photos from the meeting.

View the meetings’ powerpoint presentations and access other meeting materials on our technical meeting webpage.

Stay tuned to the MHTF for upcoming blog posts about maternal health, HIV, and AIDS as well as the forthcoming meeting report.

If you are interested in sharing your maternal health, HIV, and AIDS research and expertise on the MHTF Blog, please contact Kate Mitchell (kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu) or Samantha Lattof (slattof@hsph.harvard.edu).

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Conferences and Meetings, Evidence

This post is part of a blog series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS. To view the entire series, click here.

Today marked the first day of Maternal health, HIV, and AIDS: Examining research through a programmatic lens, a technical meeting convened in Boston, Massachusetts by the MHTF, USAID and CDC. The goal of the meeting is to bring together experts who are working to address maternal health and HIV/AIDS challenges in sub-Saharan Africa, to discuss emerging research linking maternal health and HIV, to identify research gaps, and to consider the programmatic implications of the evidence presented at the meeting.

Over the course of the first day, meeting participants presented recent research on the interconnections of maternal health and HIV. Participants covered such topics as the contribution of HIV to pregnancy-related mortality, HIV and postpartum morbidity, nutritional management of HIV infected women, stigma and discrimination, and issues of gender inequality and inequity as barriers to care, among other topics.

Day two will include conversations about lifelong ART for pregnant women, resource and programmatic challenges, ethical and medical issues, relevant experiences implementing Option B+, new policy guidelines, and the identification of key research questions that demand further exploration.

Join the conversation on Twitter: #MHHIV.

Take a look at our storify for a recap of today’s discussions.

See the photos.

View the powerpoint presentations from day one and access other meeting materials on our technical meeting webpage.

Stay tuned to the MHTF for upcoming blog posts about maternal health, HIV, and AIDS as well as daily summaries and a final report from the meeting.

If you are interested in sharing your maternal health, HIV, and AIDS research and expertise on the MHTF Blog, please contact Kate Mitchell (kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu) or Samantha Lattof (slattof@hsph.harvard.edu).

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Conferences and Meetings, Resources

Guest post written by: Gary L. Darmstadt, France Donnay, and Ann Starrs

Gary Darmstadt and France Donnay are, respectively, Director of Family Health and Senior Program Officer, Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health, at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Ann Starrs is president of FCI. This post first appeared on Impatient Optimists, the blog of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, on June 3, 2013.

 

 

 

This month, the Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine published a special issue that sheds new light on the indissoluble links between the health of a mother and that of her newborn baby. Its release comes just weeks after the Global Newborn Health Conference, and simultaneously with a State of the World’s Mothers 2013 report revealing that a baby’s first day is the most dangerous of its life.

That interconnections exist between maternal and newborn health is well known. Most maternal deaths are caused by the woman’s poor health before or during pregnancy, or by inadequate care in the critical hours and days during and just after childbirth; the same is true for most newborn deaths. And when a woman dies after giving birth, her death is far too often followed by the death of her newborn baby. And we know, based on substantial evidence, which interventions are best for improving maternal health and saving women’s lives, and which are effective for improving newborn survival.

What we didn’t sufficiently understand, until now, was the range of interventions that bring health and survival benefits to both mother and newborn. In this new study, a research team from Aga Khan University in Pakistan, working in collaboration with Family Care International and with support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, looked at more than 150 interventions, assessing them for impact on both maternal and neonatal outcomes. They then grouped the interventions into “packages of care” that can be effectively delivered at each of the key levels of care: community, health center, and hospital.

This study advances our knowledge in important ways. It reinforces the widely-recognized benefits, for women and their babies, of high-quality antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postpartum care, which are still too often insufficiently, ineffectively, or inequitably delivered. It highlights the crucial role of family planning, which can be used to delay and space pregnancies. It identifies a number of areas — including management of preconception diabetes, treatment of maternal depression, and community-based approaches for improving birth preparedness and care-seeking — which are currently neglected but could significantly improve maternal and newborn outcomes.

Most importantly, the findings send a clear message: that greater integration of maternal and newborn care — and, more broadly, of services across the reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) continuum of care — is one of our most promising strategies for strengthening efforts to save women’s and children’s lives.

This kind of integration may sound like an obvious step, but it is not always easy. Integration of services is critical if countries are to make substantial progress towards national health goals. It forces policy makers, donors, program managers, and health workers to find common ground among their varying constituencies, goals, and agendas; to understand the needs of women and their babies in new and different ways; and to design services that respond to these needs. It requires that the physical, financial, and human architecture of the health system be designed and constructed to efficiently and equitably deliver high-quality services across the continuum of care.

And yet, progress on reducing maternal and newborn deaths has been too slow, and far too many women and babies die every day. Recognizing and acting on the crucial interconnections between maternal and newborn health revealed by this study, and the broader linkages that tie together the RMNCH continuum, can help save the lives of millions of women and children. The time to take action is now.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Commentary, Evidence, Policy and Advocacy

Our colleagues at the Wilson Center Global Health Initiative are hosting a discussion with experts on rights-basedmaternity care and the intersection with family planning and HIV. The event will take place on June 11th from 3-5pm at the Wilson Center in Washington DC.

About the event:

Increasingly, family planning and HIV programs are seeking to expand their services to include maternal health care. The movement to integrate health services provides an important opportunity to share lessons learned across the different communities on their experiences with rights-based care. Join us for a discussion with experts in rights-based maternity care and its intersection with family planning and HIV.

Click here for the list of speakers for the event.

Click here to RSVP.

Click here for directions to the Wilson Center.

Learn more about this topic by visiting the MHTF’s topic pages focused on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS and respectful maternity care.

For a compilation of the latest news and publications on maternal health, HIV and AIDS, click here.

For a compilation of the latest news and publications on respectful maternity care, click here.

Explore the MHTF’s ongoing blog series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS and respectful maternity care.

If you are interested in sharing a guest blog post for our series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS and/or respectful maternity care, please contact Kate Mitchell (kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu) or Samantha Lattof (slattof@hsph.harvard.edu).

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , Posted in: Announcements, Conferences and Meetings, News, Opportunities, Policy and Advocacy

This post is the second in a blog series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS. To view the entire series, click here.

Written by: Tamil Kendall, PhD, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Women and Health Initiative

In settings where general population HIV prevalence is low (<1%), as in many parts of Latin America, Asia and Eastern Europe, policymakers and programmers are encouraged to focus their prevention and testing efforts on the most at-risk populations. In Latin America, these populations are mostly comprised of men. This often means that women from most-at-risk populations lack services tailored to their particular needs and other women are largely left out of HIV prevention and testing efforts. This is a major public health concern given what we know about early diagnosis of HIV/AIDS: Early diagnosis can lead to timely entry into care and treatment, can facilitate prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission, and can contribute to preventing sexual HIV transmission. In order to reach women in such settings, it is crucial to capitalize on women’s contact with the health system—and this means integrating HIV education and testing into reproductive and maternal-child healthcare services.

My research with HIV-positive women of reproductive age in Mexico illustrates the negative consequences of missing opportunities for HIV testing in reproductive health services, specifically prenatal care. I interviewed 55 women with HIV from Central Mexico who had had a pregnancy since 2001, when the offer of HIV testing during prenatal care was first included in the National Action Plan on HIV and AIDS. Despite universal attendance at prenatal care, less than half of the women interviewed were actually offered HIV testing.  Delayed diagnosis, disease progression, and in some cases deaths of children and male partners resulted. Failure to diagnose HIV during a woman’s first pregnancy also resulted in additional HIV infections among younger siblings.

This was compounded by the failure to offer HIV testing and misdiagnosis of women and children when they sought healthcare after developing symptoms of AIDS. The failure to recognize AIDS among women and children or consider HIV-testing resulted in expensive and unnecessary diagnostic testing and treatment. In some cases, delayed diagnosis resulted in child deaths. An HIV-positive mother described seeking a diagnosis and treatment for her son, who died and was diagnosed with HIV posthumously: “Paediatricians and more paediatricians, private ones, and the best—we spent so much money. I tell my husband: I wouldn’t care about all of the money in the world if he was here and healthy…We paid money, and we bought medicines, and nothing. And we got deeply into debt. And for what? Nothing. Doctors and doctors and nothing. Why didn’t it occur to them to think just for a minute about [HIV]? And we didn’t either because we never could have imagined it.”

In low prevalence countries like Mexico where HIV remains an “unimaginable” diagnosis for married women of childbearing age, prenatal care and other sexual and reproductive health services provide unique opportunities for women to learn they are HIV-positive, and to access lifesaving treatment for themselves and their children.

In 2011, there were 429,000 women living with HIV in Latin America—making up about a third of the 1.3 million people with HIV in the region [UNAIDS 2012]. More than 13,000 Latin American women of reproductive age died of HIV or AIDS-related causes in 2010. And notably, more than twice as many women aged 15-49 died from HIV or AIDS than from direct maternal causes [IHME Global Burden of Disease]. Yet the links between HIV and women’s health remain at the margins of many regional and country level policy discussions and programming decisions in both HIV and maternal health [Kendall and Lopez-Uribe, 2010].

I look forward to participating in the upcoming technical meeting, Maternal health, HIV, and AIDS: Examining research through a programmatic lens, starting on 10 June 2013, in collaboration with USAID and CDC. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss emerging research linking maternal health and HIV, identify research gaps, and consider programmatic implications.

Please stay tuned to the MHTF Blog for updates from the meeting.

To view the full blog series, click here

For additional information about maternal health, HIV, and AIDS, visit our topic page

Follow the meeting on Twitter starting 10 June 2013, using #MHHIV.

If you are interested in sharing a guest blog post for our series on maternal health, HIV, and AIDS, please contact Kate Mitchell (kmitchel@hsph.harvard.edu) or Samantha Lattof (slattof@hsph.harvard.edu).

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments Off Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , Posted in: Commentary, Evidence, Policy and Advocacy