Posts Tagged ‘Global Maternal Health Conference 2010’
Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl
Earlier this week, we posted on climate change and family planning on Global Mama. In addition to that, Mala Rao from the Indian Institute for Public Health gave a presentation at the Global Maternal Health Conference on “Climate change and its impact on women’s health in the developing world.”
Whenever you’re looking for information on nearly any topic relating to maternal health, be sure to check out the Sessions page on the conference website. It contains over a hundred presentations given at the GMHC from leaders in the maternal health field.
Tags: climate change, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, GMHC, GMHC 2010, maternal health, women's health
Posted in News | No Comments »
Thursday, October 21st, 2010 by Christopher Lindahl
Written by: Ashish KC
This post was originally published on the Healthy Newborn Network blog. Reprinted here with permission.
With five years remaining until the deadline for the Millennium Development Goals, experts, policy makers, donors and academics from around the globe gathered during the Global Maternal Health Conference from August 30-September 1 in Delhi to share their insight, experiences, progress and strategies to reduce the burden of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.
Participants at the Maternal Health Conference 2010 discussed global, regional and national health progress in maternal and newborn health; factors associated with the changes in numbers and the stories behind the numbers; innovative approaches to deliver evidence based interventions within local contexts; standard tools for management and tracking progress and strategies for communicating progress and challenges to stakeholders.
One of the salient features of the conference was a broad discussion of the overlap between newborn health, maternal health and achieving MDG 5. Academics advocated a paradigm shift in the global community for linking evidenced based interventions that improve the health and survival of both mothers and newborns. (Watch Dr. Zulfiqar Bhutta present objective evidence for the integration between maternal and newborn health in terms of identifying opportunities for programmatic relevance and scale-up in the conference website)
As the manager of Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives program in Nepal, I have seen how attention to maternal, child and newborn health has helped my country get on track achieve MDG 4. My presentation on Nepal’s community-based newborn care package highlighted an effective approach for providing catalytic investments to improve newborn health at the country level. The community-based newborn care package is a government lead program that receives technical assistance and catalytic inputs from Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives program. The design of the program has enabled the testing, scale up and integration of newborn health interventions into Nepal’s health system. If scaled up nationwide, I believe the program would improve maternal health outcomes in Nepal, as well.

The forum pledged to meet again to disseminate upcoming evidence and progress in maternal and newborn health. I hope it will be an occasion for celebration.
View my presentation and others from Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives team on lessons learned on newborn health advocacy and programs here.
Photo credit: Jonathan Hubschman for Save the Children
Tags: Ashish KC, community based care, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, GMHC, GMHC 2010, Healthy Newborn Network, maternal and newborn health, Millennium Development Goals, Nepal, newborn care package, newborns, Save the Children, Saving Newborn Lives, Zulfiqar Bhutta
Posted in Commentary, GMHC 2010, News | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010 by Raji Mohanam
This is a cross-posting. The post was first published on the The Huffington Post
Written By: Pam Barnes, President, EngenderHealth
This week, the world’s leaders will descend on New York City for a perfect storm of high-level events, including the United Nations Summit on the Millennium Development Goals. Millennium Development Goal No. 5 (MDG 5)—improve maternal health—will be top of mind. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is expected to launch a Global Strategy for Women and Children’s Health. And the Clinton Global Initiative Annual Meeting is dedicating an entire track to women’s and girls’ empowerment. Just this week, the UN released its latest maternal health estimates, reaffirming that, while there is evidence of progress, clearly there is much more work to be done. The good news is that the momentum behind this issue has never been greater.
Earlier this month, I had the privilege of attending the Global Maternal Health Conference 2010 in Delhi, India, with nearly 700 of the world’s foremost experts in the field. The conference was a forecast of the topics and solutions that are likely to dominate discussions on MDG 5 this week. Here are the top five:
1. Solutions are only solutions if they land in the right hands. Severe bleeding after childbirth, infections, hypertensive disorders, and unsafe abortions are the primary causes of maternal death. Safe, effective, and low-cost preventive measures and treatments exist; the challenge has been making sure that these medical technologies reach women, especially poor women, as quickly as possible. Health professionals are experimenting with new ways to effectively distribute lifesaving drugs. For example, a central strategy for expanding access to misoprostol to prevent postpartum hemorrhage involves using trained community volunteers to distribute the drug. This allows women, a majority of whom continue to give birth at home and may be far from the nearest health facility, to safely treat themselves at home postpartum.
2. Find creative solutions to increase the number of skilled health providers. The shortage of health professionals is a major barrier to reducing maternal mortality and morbidity. One approach has been to “task shift”—train and deploy more nonphysician clinicians to take on a broader range of health services, including some emergency obstetric care. Studies of this practice have shown that, given the right training and support, these providers are up to the task, having success equal to that of doctors. But this strategy is a longer term prospect and should not detract from the equally important goal of training more skilled doctors, nor should task shifting result in any health provider becoming burdened with too many responsibilities.
3. Hold decision makers accountable. Government leaders worldwide have formally committed to achieving the MDGs, but accountability has been a problem. On this front, what happens outside the health clinic can be as important as what happens within it. Just as we need more people trained to provide maternal health services, we must also invest in training advocates to pressure ministers of health and other decision makers to make real investments in reproductive health care. In many countries, a key aspect of this work involves compelling governments to provide data on where money earmarked for maternal health is spent. The Ask Your Government campaign is doing innovative work on this front to learn the extent to which governments are actually deploying the resources needed to achieve the MDGs.
4. Connect the dots. Health providers are getting increasingly sophisticated about drawing links between the underlying cultural, social, and economic factors that contribute to maternal deaths. An expectant mother who is HIV-positive, for example, needs special attention to protect her health and to help her deliver a healthy baby. Maternal health is not a “vertical issue,” but one that cuts across all of the Millennium Development Goals.
5. Strike the right balance between community- and facility-based care. For years, there has been debate about whether women are better served in health facilities or through community-based services. Such services may lack highly skilled doctors, but they also are often more accessible to poor women in rural areas. Experts at the Global Maternal Health Conference agreed that the time had come to reframe the discussion from “either or” to “both.” Where facilities are inadequate, community-based interventions can potentially serve women’s needs. But where facilities are adequate, community-based services still can be critical for supporting prenatal and postnatal care. The bottom line: Local context is everything. We need to use the approaches that best meet the realities of women in any given community.
MDG 5 consists of two specific targets. The first calls for a 75 percent reduction in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015. This is the part that most people remember. The second part doesn’t get as much attention: the goal of universal access to reproductive health care. Yet, as the five steps above demonstrate, the two parts are inextricably linked. If the initial launch of the Global Millennium Development Goals more than 10 years ago was to answer the what and why behind eradicating poverty and improving global health, then the focus now must be how we will do so.
Check out MDGFive.com, a new media initiative uniting global artists and activists for maternal health.
Tags: Ban Ki Moon, childbirth, Clinton Global Initiative, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, Global Strategy for Women, hyptertensive disorders, infections, maternal death, MDG 5, misoprostol, New York City, Pam Barnes, postpartum hemorrhage, United Nations, unsafe abortions
Posted in News, Policy | No Comments »
Tuesday, September 21st, 2010 by Raji Mohanam
It’s time for reflection on the first Global Maternal Health Conference held in Delhi 30th August to 1st September. The conference organizers are finishing uploading all the presentations, videos and photos; wrapping up the finances; and taking stock of how the conference may have added value to the accelerating maternal health movement.
Participants in the conference, both those who were there in-person and those who attended virtually via the live-stream and blogs, will soon be sent a survey designed to gather candid feedback on everything from the conference logistics to the presentations. We urge you to give some careful thought to that survey and return it promptly. Your responses will be compiled and analyzed to determine how or if the next global maternal health conference convenes.
Dr. Ann K. Blanc, the Director of the Maternal Health Task Force, is in the process of reviewing all the presentations that were given in plenaries, parallel sessions, panels and posters. Her review coupled with informal conversations she had during and after the conference will comprise a summary of the conference proceedings, highlighting new findings and new directions that maternal health experts worldwide are pursuing.
Meanwhile, we continue to welcome your blog posts and comments on the conference. You can also take a look at all the presentations that are uploaded here.
Stay tuned for Ann’s review… it promises to be fascinating!
Email your comments, questions, or blog posts on the GMHC 2010 to Raji at rmohanam@engenderhealth.org
Tags: Aftermath, blogs, Dr. Ann K. Blanc, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, live-streaming, Maternal Health Task Force, Parallel Sessions, plenaries, presentations
Posted in Announcements, GMHC 2010 | No Comments »
Wednesday, September 15th, 2010 by Raji Mohanam

Written by: Janna Oberdorf, Communications Manager for Women Deliver
The Global Maternal Health Conference has ended – and ended with a bang. The “Maternal Health Digital” panel closed the conference with exciting, new, and innovative ways for using technology for global health and maternal health issues. Advances in tools for cross-media storytelling, social networking, digital games, real-time messaging, and mobile and location-aware technologies are being adapted to fit the needs of the maternal health community—and are helping to fuel the increased momentum around the issue.
Here are some of the highlights, but watch the full session to get all the details:
- Subhi Quraishi at ZMQ Software Systems talked about using mobile gaming for edutainment, for awareness-raising, and for care support and treatment. Many of us know about using mobile technology for health information, i.e. setting an SMS alert for prenatal and postnatal care for rural women that says, “ultrasound test due” or “time for your child’s polio vaccine.” But ZMQ has launched programs that teach women about their health through games and entertainment. They also have projects in the works that target one woman with a mobile phone and offer her microfinance opportunities if she shares the information with a network of women in her community.
- Kinga Jelinska spoke about her project, www.womenonweb.org, a telemedical non-profit service helping women access Mifepristone and Misoprostol in countries with restrictive access to safe abortion. Though Jelinska talked about the need to offer safe medical abortion services to women around the world, many audience members had questions about her project – How can you determine gestation period? How do you ensure a woman who has complications receives care? How can women in low-resource settings afford the expensive medicine? Visit her website to learn more about the project.
- Kiran Bapna, from Google, talked about the brand-new launch of Health Speaks. Combining the power of local expertise with efficient online tools like the Google Translator Toolkit, Health Speaks aims to efficiently increase the amount of quality health information available online in local languages by out-sourcing (or crowd sourcing) it to volunteers.
Many new online tools, like Google’s Health Speaks, rely on the power of volunteers and their knowledge. This trust is something that is hard for many professional health experts to believe in – yet it opens so many doors to innovative ideas. During mini-presentations, others talked about the power of putting technology into the hands of the people in the field through: online reporting (Pulitzer Center’s Dying for Life); crowd-sourcing through online survey and discussion forums for midwives, nurses, and doctors (Global Voices); and interactive mapping of maternal health organizations (Maternal Health Task Force).
Though it may be difficult for researchers and experts to hand the reins of collecting and disseminating information to those in cyberspace – this is the future of maternal health. We have to have some level of trust in our cyber advocates and activists, but still maintain a watchful eye on their outputs and inputs.
Tags: Dying for Life, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, Global Voices for Maternal Health, Google, Health Speaks, Janna Oberdorf, Kinga Jelinska, Kiran Bapna, Maternal Health Digital, Maternal Health Task Force, mobile technology, Pulitzer Center, reproductive health technology, Subhi Quraishi, technology, Women Deliver, Women on Web, ZMQ Software
Posted in News | No Comments »
Friday, September 10th, 2010 by KateMitch
Written by K G Venkateswaran, IntraHealth International
A longer version of this blog was originally posted on the IntraHealth International Global Health blog.
Sitting here in Delhi at the Global Maternal Health Conference in the India Habitat Center, I feel proud to be Indian. Yes, in part it is that the conference is well-run, and the speakers are thoughtful and thought-provoking, but also it is the fact that India is among the countries showing steady decline in the numbers of deaths related to pregnancy. In fact, the latest The Lancet numbers suggest we may be achieving as many as 4% fewer deaths every year in India.
These numbers reflect years of work and commitment on the part of many groups, including the Indian government. At the conference’s opening session, a number of government representatives spoke, including Dr. Montek Singh Ahulwalia, the deputy chairman of the planning commission. He pointed out that in 2004, India spent less than 1% of its GDP on public health; today that number is 1.2%. In the next five years, the government plans to increase spending on health to 3% of the GDP. In terms of the government’s focus on saving women’s lives, Minister of Health and Family Welfare Ghulam Nabi Azad said, “Finding the solution is not the challenge; the challenge is in implementing the solution.” Azad shared the government’s strategy of prioritizing districts that are in particular need of intervention and funneling additional human resources into the health system to strengthen the country’s ability to deliver health services. Even as we scale-up our funding and focus on public health and maternal health, Dr. Gita Sen, professor at the Indian Institute of Management in Bangalore, urged the global community to look beyond its focus on lowering maternal mortality rates to actually measuring women’s health outcomes in a variety of ways that account for the social, economic, and human development context.
This week, I have also had the pleasure to present several IntraHealth-led experiences, along with my colleagues Madhuri Narayanan, Fatou Ndiaye, and Sara Stratton:
· In Uganda, expansion of human resources for health, especially in the nursing field
· In India and Uganda, alternative supervision approaches to compensate for a shortage of people in supervisory positions
· In Rwanda and Mali, strengthened pre-service education
· In Senegal, integration of indicators on use of active management of third stage labor in the national level tracking of health performance.
I have been thrilled to hear about work similar to IntraHealth’s in Nepal, India, and Tajikistan on creating call centers and working with communities to provide emergency transport to women with childbirth complications and providing women with cash incentives to make maternal health services more accessible and encourage their use.
It has been a motivating week, and I look forward to sharing more of the development from Delhi soon.
K G Venkateswaran is the deputy director of the Planning for Improving Maternal and Neonatal Health in Northern India Project at IntraHealth International, Inc.
For more posts about the Global Maternal Health Conference, click here.
Visit the conference site here.
Tags: Bangalore, Delhi, Fatou Ndiaye, Ghulam Nabi Azad, Gita Sen, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, India, India Habitat Center, Intrahealth, IntraHealth International, K G Ventateswaran, Lancet, Madhuri Narayanan, Mali, maternal health, maternal mortality, Montek Singh Ahulwalia, Nepal, Rwanda, Sara Stratton, Senegal, Tajikistan, Uganda
Posted in Commentary, GMHC 2010, Meetings | No Comments »
Thursday, September 2nd, 2010 by KateMitch
Written by Janna Oberdorf, Women Deliver
Every year, an estimated 20 million unsafe abortions take place. And of all maternal deaths, unsafe abortion accounts for 13%. Imagine if we could change that. Imagine if we could make a serious dent in the deaths and morbidities that are caused from botched abortions, from unhygienic surgeries, and from unskilled providers.
Now, imagine if we could change that with a few simple, low-cost pills. That’s what the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol are doing for women around the world.
At today’s panel session on “Reducing the toll of unsafe abortion using simple medical technology” at the Global Maternal Health Conference in Delhi, panelists laid out the landscape of how introducing and expanding access to medical abortions could save lives and prevent injury:
• Beverly Winikoff, of Gynuity Health Projects, talked about misoprostol as first-line treatment of incomplete abortion, and about introducing and expanding existing services and implications for training. As she said, misoprostol is low cost, and it can increase women’s choice and reduce the burden on doctors and health facilities.
• Patricio Sanhueza Smith, from the Secretariat of Health in Mexico City, talked about lessons learned from Mexico City on the potential of misoprostol alone for transitioning services. He said, “Medical abortion with misoprostol alone is not the Gold Standard, but it is a duty to widely disseminate its use, while mifepristone becomes available.”
• Selma Hajiri, of the Center for Research and Consultancy in Reproductive Health, talked about a randomized controlled trial of medical abortion with misoprostol only versus mifepristone plus misoprostol. She said that although the combination is the gold standard, misoprostol alone should be promoted where mifepristone is not accessible.
• Kelsey Lynd, of Stanford University, spoke about making outpatient services a reality. She discussed research on administering mifepristone and misoprostol at home, and a pregnancy test that could simplify medical abortion provision.
• Hillary Bracken, of Gynuity Health Projects, spoke about expanding access late in the first trimester, and the promise of outpatient mifepristone and misoprostol after 63 days.
Though I’m constantly amazed by the possibility and potential of mifepristone and misoprostol for safe abortion, I was even more amazed to hear about Kelsey Lynd’s work on making outpatient services a reality.
Having an abortion is a difficult and traumatic decision, with serious health repercussions. But that decision becomes so much harder when you have to pay for a sonogram to determine gestation period; to attend a clinic to take the mifepristone; to return to the clinic two week later for a follow-up visit and second dose; and to have a second sonogram to ensure the pregnancy was terminated. It’s a time-consuming and costly decision… but every one of those steps also takes an emotional toll.
Lynd presented research that showed that it is safe for women to self-administer mifepristone and misoprostol at home. Though this is great news for time and money saving reasons, it also gives women some control and choice over when to start their abortion.
Lynd also presented findings on a home pregnancy test that determine their pregnancy status after abortion. This semi-quantitative pregnancy test is administered at the health facility while the woman is pregnant to achieve a baseline of her hCG blood level. Then, 1 to 2 weeks after the woman has been administered mifepristone and misoprostol, she can use the test to check if her hCG blood level has decreased, thus confirming termination of pregnancy. In her findings, 98% of women felt they could use the test on their own in the future, and the tests identified ALL ongoing pregnancies.
The implications for this research are mind-boggling. I think it is obvious that cutting down clinic visits and sonograms would save time (for the woman and the provider) and save money. But it is the emotional implications that jump out at me. The ability for women to feel they have some control over their bodies and their abortions is something that is severely needed.
One last note is that although these findings are encouraging in making outpatient services a reality, they must be partnered with education, information, and counseling. Home abortions are a scary thing. Bleeding for days on end is a scary thing. And women need to understand complications that need treatment, and have some emotional support. We need to guide these women with the proper education, counseling, call centers, job-aids, and more, if and when we finally make outpatient services a reality.
Janna Oberdorf is the Communications Manager at Women Deliver.
Follow the Maternal Health Task Force and EngenderHealth on Twitter: @MHTF and @EngenderHealth. The conference hashtag is #GMHC2010.
For more posts about the Global Maternal Health Conference, click here.
For the live stream schedule, click here.
Check back soon for the archived videos of today’s presentations.
Tags: Beverly Winikoff, Center for Research and Consultancy in Reproductive Health, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, Gynuity Health Projects, Hillary Bracken, Janna Overdorf, Kelsey Lynd, maternal death, maternal morbidity, maternal mortality, medical abortion, mifepristone, misoprostol, outpatien abortion, Patricio Sanhueza Smith, Secretariat of Health in Mexico City, Selma Hajiri, Stanford University, unsafe abortion, Women Deliver
Posted in Commentary, Meetings | No Comments »
Linking in the newborn at the Global Maternal Health Conference
Thursday, October 21st, 2010 by Christopher LindahlWritten by: Ashish KC

This post was originally published on the Healthy Newborn Network blog. Reprinted here with permission.
With five years remaining until the deadline for the Millennium Development Goals, experts, policy makers, donors and academics from around the globe gathered during the Global Maternal Health Conference from August 30-September 1 in Delhi to share their insight, experiences, progress and strategies to reduce the burden of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.
Participants at the Maternal Health Conference 2010 discussed global, regional and national health progress in maternal and newborn health; factors associated with the changes in numbers and the stories behind the numbers; innovative approaches to deliver evidence based interventions within local contexts; standard tools for management and tracking progress and strategies for communicating progress and challenges to stakeholders.
One of the salient features of the conference was a broad discussion of the overlap between newborn health, maternal health and achieving MDG 5. Academics advocated a paradigm shift in the global community for linking evidenced based interventions that improve the health and survival of both mothers and newborns. (Watch Dr. Zulfiqar Bhutta present objective evidence for the integration between maternal and newborn health in terms of identifying opportunities for programmatic relevance and scale-up in the conference website)
As the manager of Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives program in Nepal, I have seen how attention to maternal, child and newborn health has helped my country get on track achieve MDG 4. My presentation on Nepal’s community-based newborn care package highlighted an effective approach for providing catalytic investments to improve newborn health at the country level. The community-based newborn care package is a government lead program that receives technical assistance and catalytic inputs from Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives program. The design of the program has enabled the testing, scale up and integration of newborn health interventions into Nepal’s health system. If scaled up nationwide, I believe the program would improve maternal health outcomes in Nepal, as well.
The forum pledged to meet again to disseminate upcoming evidence and progress in maternal and newborn health. I hope it will be an occasion for celebration.
View my presentation and others from Save the Children’s Saving Newborn Lives team on lessons learned on newborn health advocacy and programs here.
Photo credit: Jonathan Hubschman for Save the Children
[Translate]
Tags: Ashish KC, community based care, Global Maternal Health Conference 2010, GMHC, GMHC 2010, Healthy Newborn Network, maternal and newborn health, Millennium Development Goals, Nepal, newborn care package, newborns, Save the Children, Saving Newborn Lives, Zulfiqar Bhutta
Posted in Commentary, GMHC 2010, News | No Comments »