Posts Tagged ‘Women Deliver’

Call for Nominations: Women Deliver 50, Inspiring Ideas & Solutions to Deliver for Girls & Women

Monday, January 30th, 2012 by Christopher Lindahl

50Banner.gif

 

The following originally appeared on Women Deliver’s blog. It is posted here with permission.

 

Every year, in conjunction with International Women’s Day, Women Deliver celebrates the progress made on behalf of girls and women worldwide. Our Women Deliver 100 list in 2011, which featured 100 of the most inspiring people who have delivered for girls and women, was covered by over 100 traditional and new media sources. This year, to continue the momentum, we are spotlighting the top 50 inspiring ideas and solutions that deliver for girls and women. We would love to hear what you think are the most innovative, impactful, and promising advancements in overcoming gender inequality.

 

These advancements could have been made by an individual, governments, the private sector, or civil society, but they must have helped to improve the condition of girls and women around the world, in one or more of the following 5 categories:

  • Technologies and Innovations
  • Educational Initiatives
  • Health Modernization
  • Advocacy and Awareness Campaigns
  • Leadership and Empowerment Programs

 

Examples of inequities that the solutions may have addressed include, but are not limited to: Violence Against Women; Sex Trafficking; Child Marriage; Political Processes; Maternal Health; Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights; HIV/AIDS, Lesbian; Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights; Economic Inequity; or Female Genital Mutilation.

 

NOMINATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 10, 2012.

 

Once all nominations have been received, a selection committee of experts and advocates from leading global NGOs and foundations will choose 25 per category. Voting opens on February 20th, and the Top 50 (10 winners per category) will be announced on International Women’s Day. The winners from each category will be featured prominently on Women Deliver’s website, through the selection committee’s social media portals, and at the Women Deliver 2013 conference in Kuala Lumpur.

 

Criteria:

  • Advancements may include projects, programs, technologies, initiatives, or campaigns launched anywhere in the world
  • Solution or Idea must have been implemented in the last five years
  • Can be grassroots or global in scale (example: community initiative or global technology)
  • If the solution has been ongoing for more than a year, please provide quantitative and qualitative data that demonstrates results
  • If the idea is in the early stages of implementation, please include an explanation of why it will be effective
  • Please provide website (if applicable) and references

 

Selection Committee:

-Chair: Jill Sheffield, Founder and President of Women Deliver
-Jimmie Briggs, Founder and Executive Director of Man Up
-Cory Heyman, Chief Program Officer at Room to Read
-Josh Nesbit, CEO of Medic Mobile
-Amie Newman, Communications Officer and Editor of the Impatient Optimist at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
-Lyric Thompson, Special Assistant to the President at the International Center for Research on Women
-Michael Tirrell, Communications Manager for Media and Public Affairs at Marie Stopes International

 

Click here to make a nomination. Thank you in advance for you submissions!

  • Share/Bookmark

10 Maternal Health Highlights of 2011

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012 by Christopher Lindahl

Written by: Women Deliver

 

The following originally appeared on Women Deliver’s blog. It is reposted here with permission

 

This year has been one of forward momentum, innovative solutions and inspiring individuals. As 2011 comes to a close, it’s time to celebrate achievements and look at some of the most memorable milestones and events of the past year. Moving into 2012, we are armed with the knowledge of what success looks like. We must continue to work to ensure that girls and women are at the heart of development efforts, now and in the years to come.

 

Haz clic aquí para leer este mensaje en Español.
Cliquez ici pour lire ce message en Français.

 

1. Ban Ki-moon Launches Expert Commission on Women’s and Children’s Health January 2011
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has proven himself to be a champion for the health of girls and women, from the beginning of his Every Woman Every Child campaign to this year’s launch of the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women’s and Children’s Health. With President Kikwete of Tanzania and Prime Minister Harper of Canada as co-chairs and a diverse group of 30 expert, cross-sectoral stakeholders including Women Deliver’s President Jill Sheffield, the Commission served as an important accountability mechanism for the maternal health field. With the presentation of its final report, Keeping Promises, Measuring Results, the Commission worked to ensure that countries and their partners are held accountable for reaching MDGs 4 and 5, and that information and financial flows are accessible and transparent.

 

2. The 100th Anniversary of International Women’s Day: Spotlight on Inspiring People Delivering for Girls and Women March 2011

wd100-banner.jpg

On the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day, Women Deliver honored 100 of the most inspiring people fighting to save and improve the lives of girls and women. These 100 men and women– ranging from doctors to human rights activists, political leaders, economists, educators, journalists, philanthropists, and youth advocates–remind us that we can each make a real difference for girls and women.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

  • Share/Bookmark

Be Heard: Reproductive and Maternal Health After 2015

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Women Deliver has been running a series of blog posts addressing the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals in 2015. A number of experts have offered thoughts on a global framework for health after the MDGs. Now is your chance to add to the discussion as Women Deliver is hosting an online discussion starting next week to address reproductive and maternal health:

With the deadlines for the Millennium Development Goals and the International Conference on Population and Development’s Program of Action fast approaching, Women Deliver is calling on the entire reproductive and maternal health community—from policymakers to health workers to advocates—to participate in an online discussion to shape the future of our field. Join this critical global conversation at www.knowledge-gateway.org/womendeliver and weigh in on where we are, where we need to be, and how we need to get there.

 

This means taking stock of lessons learned, challenges ahead, and tackling the critical question: What will—and what must—happen to the MDGs and ICPD after 2015? Through a series of weekly, e-mail-based discussions, you will have the chance to share your thoughts, experience, and views on specific questions, like the effectiveness of global versus regional MDG targets, the role of civil society in shaping development goals, and the appropriate maternal and reproductive health indicator of tomorrow.

 

The forum will be open from November 7th to November 23rd so be sure to make your voice heard!

  • Share/Bookmark

Buzz Meeting: How Do We Expand the Maternal Health Community Without Losing Focus?

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Written by: Janna Oberdorf, Director of Communications and Outreach, Women Deliver

 

At the end of the two and a half days of the MHTF Buzz meeting, my brain is certainly buzzing with ideas, thoughts, and more than anything – questions. The goal of the meeting was to bring up “5 Questions You Need to Ask About Maternal Health Right Now,” and to discuss and debate these tough questions. At first, I think it was really challenging for the group to think about asking tough questions without focusing on finding answers – something our community strives to do. But, looking back, I feel really privileged to have had the space to think about maternal health on a different scale – to see beyond “next steps” and “action plans” and to have the freedom to think big.

 

One thing that struck me was a key question that was addressed towards the end of the meeting: How do we expand the maternal health community without losing focus? The “askers” of this question were getting to the heart of inclusion and integration of other development issues like newborn health, child health, women’s health, women’s empowerment, etc. But, I think this question can make us go beyond the integration piece and think more critically about what does it mean to “expand” the community.

 

For the past two years, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about and striving to get more young people involved in maternal health. I’ve talked about the need for new voices in the field, the need to ensure the future of the movement by investing in the leaders of tomorrow, and the need to pass on the lessons of the last 25 years of the “safe motherhood” initiative so we don’t lose what has already been learned. But, being at the buzz meeting, I came to realize that the need to expand the community goes so much farther than just a question of age. Countless times at this meeting, participants would qualify their statements and contributions by saying, “I’m not an expert in maternal health, but…” or “I’m on the outside of this issue, but…” I did it often myself in saying, “I know I’m new to this field, but…” What I came to realize is that we need to expand our community to include young people, for sure, but we also need to be better about letting our guard down to all people who are engaged and excited about working to improve maternal health – whether they are 18, 35, or 75.

 

We need to accept that everyone will come from a different perspective and will have a different set of skills, and it’s this diversity of interested actors that could potentially push the maternal health issue forward. We need more people to feel like they can be part of the solution.

 

At the same time, the maternal health community should work to pass down the history of the last 25 years in a way that excites and engages new players rather than builds barriers. I think that a major part of this is an immense need for better intergenerational dialogue – we need to ensure that the future leaders in the maternal health community inherit the wisdom and the knowledge of the past 25 years without inheriting the baggage. We need to learn from what the current leaders know, but feel freedom to challenge, try new things, and even re-try things in a new generation and new context.

 

Meetings like the MHTF Buzz are an important step in this process. It’s always more satisfying to answer questions than to ask questions, but both are so essential to move forward. “I know I’m new to this field, but…” I feel optimistic that we can and will make progress on maternal health. So let’s start bridging the knowledge gap not just in data and research, but look to bridging gaps between issues, between generations, and between people.

  • Share/Bookmark

Buzz Meeting: Is There a Maternal Health Movement?

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Written by: Janna Oberdorf, Director of Communications and Outreach, Women Deliver

 

I was incredibly lucky and honored to participate in the Maternal Health Task Force Buzz Meeting today with a room full of professional researchers, advocates, and maternal health experts from around the world. The day was interesting, educational, and challenging all at the same time, and I feel like I left with a lot of difficult questions to answer in my own work and to bring back to my organization.

 

One of the biggest and most contentious questions posed during the day’s discussion was: “Is There a Maternal Health Movement?” Jeremy Shiffman, associate professor of Public Administration and Policy at American University, laid out a clear and concise answer from his perspective: No. According to Professor Shiffman, grassroots mobilization and action, an element that he defines as essential and at the core of a “movement,” is missing from the maternal health work and community. Unlike other movements, including HIV/AIDS, breast cancer, or the Arab Spring, the maternal health community is still weak in engaging grassroots-level action, according to Professor Shiffman.

 

I agree that the maternal health community has a long way to go in mobilizing the women and the families on the ground who are truly affected by maternal mortality and morbidities. But, I am perhaps more optimistic than Professor Shiffman. I see the seeds that have been planted – though I know that it will take time, effort, and care to grow those seeds into action. Much of today’s discussion focused on the fact that there has been a “top-down” push for maternal health instead of “bottom-up” – a criticism of global advocacy. What I am hoping for, and what I think we need to work towards, is a sandwiching of advocacy and activism for better health for girls and women around the world. Let’s refocus from top and bottom, and start to focus on a push from both sides.

 

Additionally, much of today’s discussion was around whether we need a maternal health movement? What constitutes a movement and what doesn’t? What would and should a maternal health movement look like? Should it mimic the HIV/AIDS movement or have an identity all its own? How can we encourage a movement in countries where women are disenfranchised, poor, illiterate, and/or marginalized? To me, all of these questions are missing the point.

 

However you want to define a “movement,” and whether you think it’s happening right now or might happen in the future, I feel like we would all agree to a few key points:

  1. We need to raise awareness about maternal health and quality of care within communities and to educate the women who are vulnerable to maternal mortality and morbidity to seek proper care.
  2. By raising the awareness among women, their families, and their communities, the goal is for them to seek quality care and understand that maternal deaths aren’t normal, aren’t right, and aren’t something everyone should just expect to happen based on the flip of coin.
  3. When women and communities understand the components of the continuum of care and a healthy pregnancy and childbirth, and if they don’t receive the care they seek, they should push their governments to action and hold them accountable.

To me, this is the point. We need women on the ground to understand maternal health, to seek maternal health services and information, to understand that maternal deaths are not a necessary evil, and to hold their governments accountable when they are denied such services. Call it movement… call it grassroots advocacy… call it activism… call it what you will. The goal is the same. And we need to encourage this type of action.

 

At Women Deliver, we’ve been pushing for a global response to maternal mortality in the form of political will and financial investment in MDG5. And over the last few years, we’ve had some success in getting on the political agenda and in having promises and commitments made to maternal health. But we need to focus on the sandwich – we need women, families, and communities on the ground to push for improved health services for girls and women in their nations while continuing to put pressure on global actors to meet their commitments. It doesn’t matter to me if you call it a movement or if it goes down in the history books as one, but I think we’d all agree that there needs to be a push from both sides to have sustainable progress on issues that affect girls’ and women’s health.

  • Share/Bookmark

After the MDGs in The Guardian

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

With the deadline of 2015 for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) fast approaching, many people are discussing the possibilities for global frameworks after 2015. We discussed the topic on GlobalMama, and Women Deliver is running a series of posts called “Beyond 2015.”

 

Alicia Yamin from Harvard University and Sakiko Fukuda-Parr from the New School add to the conversation in The Guardian. They argue that any framework that replaces or extends the MDGs must address some of the criticisms leveled at the MDGs:

Nations must agree on a new set of goals. Ending poverty necessitates the confrontation of ever-changing challenges and shifting priorities; it also involves addressing the underlying exclusion and discrimination that fuel poverty and violate human rights.

 

The successor goals and targets must consider lessons from the current set of MDGs, which are extremely narrow. They focus on sub-sections of certain social sectors and selective human needs. Greater balance could be achieved by including such challenges as creating decent work, reinforcing social protection, and increasing productivity; addressing climate change and its disparate impacts on the poor; ameliorating risks of global financial and commodity market crises; ensuring fairer trade rules; and, finally, reducing gaping inequalities within and between countries, based on class, gender and ethnicity, among other factors.

  • Share/Bookmark

Three Possibilities for a Post-MDG Framework

Monday, August 15th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Women Deliver has been hosting a discussion of what global frameworks might exists in post-Millennium Development Goal world after 2015 in a series “Beyond 2015.” Last week, Andy Sumner of the Institute of Development Studies and the Center for Global Development laid out three possibilities:

The first option, could be called MDGs 2020/2025 and would simply extending the deadline of 2015, perhaps with some minor changes to the indicators and goals in order to reflect that new timeline.

 

A second approach could be called MDGs+ and would still be a goal-led framework, but either set by national governments through deliberative processes, or by a combination of a streamlined set of global indicators (child nutrition, infant mortality and primary/secondary enrolment rates) with actual indicators and targets set by national governments via deliberative processes.

 

A third approach could be called a ‘One World’ or ‘Global Challenges’ approach and would be much bolder and more ambitious. It would build a global agreement binding both north and south, with poverty targets for the south and sustainable consumption targets for the north.

  • Share/Bookmark

Weekend Reading

Friday, July 8th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

This week on the MHTF blog:

  1. Joslyn Meier and Peter Mukasa of EngenderHealth wrote about partograph use in Uganda
  2. We posted about demand and supply side interventions for maternal health
  3. A review of evidence on referral system interventions
  4. Find out what Women Delivering is doing to get us thinking about a post-MDG world

Some reading for the weekend:

  1. Tradition and modernity in Guatemala
  2. Using model districts to improve health systems in India
  3. Women, water, and a dam in Ethiopia
  4. Maternal mortality is falling in India
  • Share/Bookmark

Jill Sheffield on a post-MDG world

Friday, July 8th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Back in May, we posted on GlobalMama about how to start thinking about advocacy, development and health policy after the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) reach their 2015 deadline:

[After 2015] a useful framework for addressing some development challenges will disappear. Even if all of the MDGs are achieved, which looks highly unlikely, none of the problems associated with them will have disappeared. Reducing poverty by half or maternal mortality by two-thirds still leaves a large number of people in poverty and mothers dying due to pregnancy complications.

 

Today, Jill Sheffield, President of Women Deliver, echoed similar thoughts and unveiled what Women Deliver will be doing to being conversations about maternal health and other health issues beyond 2015:

Beginning now and into 2012, we will post every few weeks the opinions of key thought-leaders around the globe about ICPD [International Conference on Population and Development] and MDG5 and what should happen after the deadline dates of 2014 and 2015. We will ask them to speak to specific questions and encourage you to comment. In the fall, we will have an online discussion forum to gather further comments, ideas, questions, and suggestions. It’s time to begin the conversation—and we have designated space on Women Deliver’s website to do just that.

 

Check out the entire post and be sure to keep an eye on Women Deliver’s site as the conversations unfold.

  • Share/Bookmark

Misoprostol added to WHO list of essential medicines for PPH

Thursday, May 19th, 2011 by Christopher Lindahl

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality, accounting for about 25% of all maternal deaths. Misprostol is an easy to use drug that is shown to be successful in preventing PPH. Earlier this month, the World Health Organization added misoprostol to its List of Essential Medicines for the prevention of PPH. The news is the culmination of years of research and advocacy.

 

Jill Sheffield of Women Deliver writes:

Now that misoprostol is recognized as an essential medicine, we must take the next step and help translate this development into increased awareness, approval, and access in every country with a high rate of maternal death. The small white pill is inexpensive, stable even in warmer climates, and is easy-to-use, making it ideal for community-level delivery where oxytocin is not available or cannot be safely used. Simply put, this pill can save lives by preventing women from bleeding to death during and after delivery.

 

Krishna Jafa of PSI also lauds the decision:

The WHO’s designation of misoprostol in its List of Essential Medicines is significant because many national governments follow WHO guidelines when drawing up their own national essential medicines list; drugs on national essential medicines lists are often prioritized by governments for budgetary allocations and procurement. We can now expect that misoprostol will be more widely available in the places it is most needed.

 

Finally, Melanie Holden of Venture Strategies Innovations says:

Within VSI we are elated. This is a tremendous boon for women’s health and solidifies misoprostol’s role in making childbirth safer. As co-authors of the application with Gynuity Health Projects, we are enormously proud of this accomplishment and how it will translate to lives saved around the globe.

  • Share/Bookmark